Browse Health Policy Project (2010-2016) Materials
- Advocacy
- Best Practices
- Capacity Development
- Child Protection
- Civil Society Engagement
- Contraceptive Security
- Costed Implementation Plan
- Costing
- Demographic Dividend
- Efficiency & Effectiveness
- Equity
- Family Planning/Reproductive Health
- FP2020
- Gender
- Gender-based Violence
- GeoHealth Mapping
- Governance, Stewardship & Accountability
- Health Financing
- Health Systems Strengthening
- HIV
- ImpactNow
- Integration
- Leadership
- Malaria
- Maternal Health
- Men having Sex with Men
- Millennium Development Goals
- Modeling
- Monitoring & Evaluation
- Non-Government/Community Service Org.
- OneHealth
- Orphans and Vulnerable Children
- Other Health Domains
- Parliamentarians
- People Living With HIV
- People who Inject Drugs
- Policy
- Private Sector
- RAPID
- Religious Leaders/FBOs
- Repositioning Family Planning
- Scale-up
- Sex Workers
- Spectrum
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Stigma and Discrimination
- Sustainable Financing
- Transgender
- Universal Health Coverage
- Urban and Rural Poor
- Women
- Youth
- GAP Tool
- MDG Briefs
- Nigeria Health Financing Conference
- Nigeria RAPID
- Respectful Maternity Care
- Stigma Package
- Ghana RAPID
- OCA Suite of Tools
- CIP Resource Kit
- Central Asian Republics
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Dominican Republic
- E&E
- Ethiopia
- Ghana
- Global
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- India
- Jamaica
- Jordan
- Kenya
- LAC
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mali
- Mozambique
- Nepal
- Nigeria
- Russia
- South Africa
- Tanzania
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- West Africa
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
Country and regional assignments reflect those made at the time of production and may not correspond to current USAID designations.
Files will load from www.healthpolicyproject.com.
List entries are alphabetical by title and contain the title, abstract, and then the filename which is hyperlinked and will open in a new browser window. Most files are PDFs. There may be multiple files per abstract.
Specific
As donor budgets for HIV have flat-lined, funding for HIV services and programming has decreased, particularly in countries with higher income status and concentrated HIV epidemics. To examine the impact of recent or ongoing PEPFAR funding transitions on key populations, the USAID- and PEPFAR-funded Health Policy Project (HPP) hosted a global consultation with key population civil society networks and developed case studies on PEPFAR’s transitions in four countries: Bangladesh, Botswana, China, and Guyana. The case studies offers lessons learned on how donors can ensure the resiliency of HIV programming for key populations while undergoing funding transitions.
In addition, HPP developed the Readiness Assessment: Moving Toward a Country-led and –financed HIV Response for Key Populations. This guide is designed to assess the ability of a country’s stakeholders (including government, development partners, and civil society) to lead and sustain HIV epidemic control among key populations as donors transition to different levels and types of funding. The guide is a flexible tool that assesses readiness across four domains and focuses on the specific vulnerabilities of key populations.
- Case Study: Bangladesh 462_HPPBangladeshBriefMarchFINAL.pdf 1680.06 kb
- Case Study: Botswana 462_HPPBotswanaBriefMarchFINAL.PDF 263.67 kb
- Case Study: China 462_HPPChinaBriefMarchFINAL.PDF 561.03 kb
- Case Study: Guyana 462_HPPGuyanaCaseStudyMarch.pdf 311.08 kb
- Responsible Transitions Overview Brief 462_HPPHResponsibleTransitionsOverviewBriefM.pdf 5635.19 kb
- Readiness Assessment for Donor Transitions 462_SIDChecklistfillableinreader.pdf 756.32 kb