Browse Health Policy Project (2010-2016) Materials
- Advocacy
- Best Practices
- Capacity Development
- Child Protection
- Civil Society Engagement
- Contraceptive Security
- Costed Implementation Plan
- Costing
- Demographic Dividend
- Efficiency & Effectiveness
- Equity
- Family Planning/Reproductive Health
- FP2020
- Gender
- Gender-based Violence
- GeoHealth Mapping
- Governance, Stewardship & Accountability
- Health Financing
- Health Systems Strengthening
- HIV
- ImpactNow
- Integration
- Leadership
- Malaria
- Maternal Health
- Men having Sex with Men
- Millennium Development Goals
- Modeling
- Monitoring & Evaluation
- Non-Government/Community Service Org.
- OneHealth
- Orphans and Vulnerable Children
- Other Health Domains
- Parliamentarians
- People Living With HIV
- People who Inject Drugs
- Policy
- Private Sector
- RAPID
- Religious Leaders/FBOs
- Repositioning Family Planning
- Scale-up
- Sex Workers
- Spectrum
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Stigma and Discrimination
- Sustainable Financing
- Transgender
- Universal Health Coverage
- Urban and Rural Poor
- Women
- Youth
- GAP Tool
- MDG Briefs
- Nigeria Health Financing Conference
- Nigeria RAPID
- Respectful Maternity Care
- Stigma Package
- Ghana RAPID
- OCA Suite of Tools
- CIP Resource Kit
- Central Asian Republics
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Dominican Republic
- E&E
- Ethiopia
- Ghana
- Global
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- India
- Jamaica
- Jordan
- Kenya
- LAC
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mali
- Mozambique
- Nepal
- Nigeria
- Russia
- South Africa
- Tanzania
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- West Africa
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
Country and regional assignments reflect those made at the time of production and may not correspond to current USAID designations.
Files will load from www.healthpolicyproject.com.
List entries are alphabetical by title and contain the title, abstract, and then the filename which is hyperlinked and will open in a new browser window. Most files are PDFs. There may be multiple files per abstract.
Specific
In 2015, in order to examine the implications for key populations of reduced donor funding in Bangladesh and to provide guidance for future transitions, the USAID- and PEPFAR-funded Health Policy Project (HPP) conducted a desk review and 20 key informant interviews with civil society, local government, and international donors. The resulting case study offers lessons learned on how donors can ensure the resiliency of HIV programming for key populations while undergoing funding transitions.
- 467_HPPBangladeshBriefMarchFINAL.pdf 1680.06 kb