Browse POLICY Project (1995-2006) Materials
Skip to Keyword List
Skip to Series List
Skip to Country List
- Adolescent Reproductive Health
- Advocacy
- Capacity Building
- Evaluation
- Family Planning/Reproductive Health
- Gender
- HIV/AIDS
- Human Rights
- Planning and Finance
- Research/Models
- Safe Motherhood
- Core Packages-TOO Final Reports
- Core Packages-Progress and Synthesis
- Country Reports
- Manuals, Guidelines
- Maternal and Neonatal Program Effort Index
- Monographs
- Other
- Political Commitment Series
- POLICY Issues in Planning and Finance
- Occasional Papers
- Policy, Plan
- Research Briefs
- General Reports
- Working Papers
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Angola
- Asia and the Near East
- Argentina
- Brazil
- Benin
- Burkina Faso
- Bangladesh
- Bolivia
- Botswana
- China
- Cambodia
- Cote D'Ivoire
- Congo
- Chad
- Cameroon
- Costa Rica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
- El Salvador
- Ghana
- Guinea
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Indonesia
- India
- Jordan
- Jamaica
- Kenya
- Latin America and the Caribbean
- Laos
- Lesotho
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mali
- Morocco
- Mynamar
- Mauritania
- Mexico
- Mozambique
- Nepal
- Nigeria
- Nicaragua
- Namibia
- Niger
- Peru
- Paraguay
- Philippines
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Southern Africa
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- South Africa
- SAHEL/CERPOD
- Sri Lanka
- Senegal
- Swaziland
- Tanzania
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Turkey
- Togo
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- Vietnam
- West Africa Regional Program
- Worldwide
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
- Zambia
Country and regional assignments reflect those made at the time of production and may not correspond to current USAID designations.
Files will load from www.policyproject.com.
List entries are alphabetical by title and contain the title, abstract, language, and then the filename which is hyperlinked and will open in a new browser window. Many files are PDFs but some of the older ones are Word documents.
Specific
User fees are gaining widespread use in government health programs as a means of alleviating pressure on constrained budgets as demand for services increases. Concerns that fees reduce access to services among the poor have led to the promotion of fee exemption mechanisms in order to protect those unable to pay for services. The exemptions, however, may not effectively ensure access among the poor because (1) informal fees and other costs associated with seeking and receiving services are not alleviated by most exemption mechanisms and (2) exemption mechanisms are poorly implemented. The low proportion of formal fees to total costs to the consumer and the unpredictable nature of informal fees and other costs of access may actually work against formal fee exemption mechanisms. Even though little is known about how well fee and waiver mechanisms function for maternal health services, it is important to understand whether exemption mechanisms alone hold promise for protecting access for the poor or whether the mechanisms need to be supplemented with other strategies. This study was conducted simultaneously in five countries: Egypt, India (Uttaranchal), Kenya, Peru, and Vietnam. The objectives were to survey actual costs to consumers for antenatal and delivery care; survey current fee and waiver mechanisms; assess the degree to which these mechanisms function; assess the degree to which informal costs to consumers constitute a barrier to service; and review current policies and practices regarding the setting of fees and the collection, retention, and use of revenue.
English
WPS16.pdf