Browse POLICY Project (1995-2006) Materials
Skip to Keyword List
Skip to Series List
Skip to Country List
- Adolescent Reproductive Health
- Advocacy
- Capacity Building
- Evaluation
- Family Planning/Reproductive Health
- Gender
- HIV/AIDS
- Human Rights
- Planning and Finance
- Research/Models
- Safe Motherhood
- Core Packages-TOO Final Reports
- Core Packages-Progress and Synthesis
- Country Reports
- Manuals, Guidelines
- Maternal and Neonatal Program Effort Index
- Monographs
- Other
- Political Commitment Series
- POLICY Issues in Planning and Finance
- Occasional Papers
- Policy, Plan
- Research Briefs
- General Reports
- Working Papers
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Angola
- Asia and the Near East
- Argentina
- Brazil
- Benin
- Burkina Faso
- Bangladesh
- Bolivia
- Botswana
- China
- Cambodia
- Cote D'Ivoire
- Congo
- Chad
- Cameroon
- Costa Rica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
- El Salvador
- Ghana
- Guinea
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Indonesia
- India
- Jordan
- Jamaica
- Kenya
- Latin America and the Caribbean
- Laos
- Lesotho
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mali
- Morocco
- Mynamar
- Mauritania
- Mexico
- Mozambique
- Nepal
- Nigeria
- Nicaragua
- Namibia
- Niger
- Peru
- Paraguay
- Philippines
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Southern Africa
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- South Africa
- SAHEL/CERPOD
- Sri Lanka
- Senegal
- Swaziland
- Tanzania
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Turkey
- Togo
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- Vietnam
- West Africa Regional Program
- Worldwide
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
- Zambia
Country and regional assignments reflect those made at the time of production and may not correspond to current USAID designations.
Files will load from www.policyproject.com.
List entries are alphabetical by title and contain the title, abstract, language, and then the filename which is hyperlinked and will open in a new browser window. Many files are PDFs but some of the older ones are Word documents.
Specific
Although user fees are increasingly being used in government health programs to alleviate the pressure on constrained budgets as demand for services increases, results in developing countries thus far have been mixed and concerns that fees reduce access to services among the poor have led to the promotion of fee exemption mechanisms. These exemptions, however, may not be an effective response because (1) informal fees and other costs associated with seeking and receiving services are not alleviated by most exemption mechanisms, and (2) exemption mechanisms are often poorly implemented. The low proportion of formal fees to total costs to the consumer and the unpredictable nature of informal fees may actually work against formal fee exemption mechanisms. Thus, it is important to assess whether these mechanisms alone hold promise for protecting access among the poor, or whether they need to be supplemented with other strategies. The objectives of this study were to: (1) survey actual costs to consumers for reproductive health (RH) care services including antenatal care (ANC), delivery care, family planning (FP), postabortion care (PAC), child healthcare, and reproductive tract infection (RTI) treatment; (2) review fee and waiver mechanisms; (3) assess the degree to which these mechanisms function as intended; (4) assess the degree to which residual costs to consumers (after accounting for fee exemptions) may constitute a barrier to these services; and (5) review current policies and practices on setting charges and collecting, retaining, and using fee revenue.
English
India Maternal Health User Fee Paper.Country Report.FINAL.doc